What is the basic value for moral reparation for improper inclusion in the defaulter register?
Keywords:
pain and suffering damages, jurimetry, biphasic methodAbstract
From the survey of cases judged by the Superior Court of Justice, over a period of 20 (twenty) years, the study proposes the basic value for purposes of moral reparation in cases of undue inclusion in a defaulter's list. Based on the procedural data regarding the updated values of the convictions, it was possible to elaborate three scenarios, with the quantification of the annual average of payments, which confirmed the tendency for a decrease in the value of moral reparation, indicating what can be expected in new lawsuits. The study raises some hypotheses to be tested as to the causes of the downward trend in payments.
References
BECKER, FERNANDA ELISABETH NÖTHEN. Custas judiciais e justiça gratuita como fator de (in)eficiência da prestação jurisdicional. 2018, Dissertação em mestrado profissional apresentada na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis.
CIALDINI, Robert B.; VINCENT, Joyce E.; LEWIS, Stephen K.; CATALAN, Jose; WHEELER, Diane; DARBY, Betty Lee. Reciprocal Concessions Procedure for Inducing Compliance: The Door-in-the-Face Technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Washington DC, Vol. 31, nº. 2, pp. 206-215, 1975.
COASE, Ronald. The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law & Economics, Chicago, vol. 3, pp. 1–44, 1960.
LEAL. Rogério Gesta. IMPACTOS Econômicos e Sociais das decisões judiciais: aspectos introdutórios. Brasília: ENFAM, 2010.
SANSEVERINO, Paulo de Tarso Vieira. Princípio da reparação integral: indenização no Código Civil, São Paulo: Saraiva, 2010.
TVERSKY, Amos; KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, Washington DC, New Series Vol. 185, nº 4157, pp. 1124-1131, 1974.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Constitutional Research the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).