Justice institutions facing epistemic injustices in sexual violence

Justice institutions facing epistemic injustices in sexual violence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70622/2238-7110.2025.668

Keywords:

epistemic injustice, epistemic justice, sexual abuse, Aquilina

Abstract

This article interrogates the possibility that justice, understood as an institution, can be transformed by recognizing epistemic injustices related to sexual abuse as structural injustices. To this end, I will analyze Judge Rosemary Aquilina's decision to invite more than 150 survivors of sexual abuse to testify in the Larry Nassar trial. I argue that this act of listening to and accompanying survivors during the hearings recognizes the value of narrating the experience of sexual abuse, and shows the harm of epistemic injustice due to biases that interfere with the credibility of victims and power structures that silence testimony. In a second moment, I analyze the hearings where there is a collective participation of survivors as a space of accompaniment that empowers them as epistemic subjects and moral agents.

Author Biography

Miriam Jerade, Universidade Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile

Professora Assistente do Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade Adolfo Ibáñez.

References

ALCOFF, Linda M. Rape and resistance. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2018.

ANDERSON, Elizabeth. Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions. Social Epistemology, [s.l.], v. 26, n. 2, p. 163-73, 2012.

BANET-WEISER, Sarah; HIGGINGS, Kathryn Claire. Television and the “honest” woman: mediating the labor of believability. Television & New Media, [s.l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 127-47, 2021.

BAUMTROG, Michael D.; PEACH, Harmony. They can’t be believed: children, intersectionality, and epistemic injustice. Journal of Global Ethics, [s.l.], v. 15, n. 3, p. 213-32, 2019.

BIERRIA, Alisa. Missing in action: violence, power and discerning agency. Hypatia, [s.l.], v. 29, n.1, p. 129-45, 2014.

BRISON, Susan. Aftermath: violence and the remaking of a self. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002.

BURKE, Tarana. 2017. #MeToo was started for black and brown women and girls. They’re still being ignored. The Washington Post, 9 Nov. 2017. Disponível em: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/11/09/the-waitress-who-works-in-the-diner-needs-to-know-that-the-issue-of-sexual-harassment-is-about-her-too. Acesso em: 30 set. 2025.

BURROUGHS, Michael D.; TOLLEFSEN, Deborah. Learning to listen: epistemic injustice and the child. Episteme, [s.l.], v. 13, n.3, p. 359-77, 2016.

CAREL, Havi; GYÖRFFY, Gita. Seen but not heard: children and epistemic injustice. The Lancet, [s.l.], v. 384, p. 1256-1257, Oct. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(14)61759-1/fulltext. Acesso em: 24 jul. 2025.

CASSEL, Paul. In defense of victim impact statements. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, [s.l.], v. 6, n. 611, p. 611-647, 2009.

DENHOLLANDER, Rachel. El precio que pagué por denunciar a Larry Nassar. New York Times, New York, 30 Jan. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/es/2018/01/30/rachael-denhollander-larry-nassar/. Acesso em: 24 jul. 2025.

DOUGAN, Kyser. Judge, victim from Larry Nassar trial speaks at KU on restorative justice. The University Daily Kansan, 1 Mar. 2019. Disponível em: http://www.kansan.com/news/judge-victim-from-larry-nassar-trial-speaks-at-ku-on/article_4c068666-3c53-11e9-8ecc-73bd47a6f899.html. Acesso em: 24 jul. 2025

DU MONT, Janice; MILLER, Karen-Lee; MYHR, Terri. The Role of “Real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, [s.l.], v. 9, n. 4, p. 466-486, abr. 2003.

FELMAN, Shoshana. The Juridical Unconscious: trials and traumas in the twentieth century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2003.

GASH, Alison; HARDING, Ryan. #MeToo?: Legal Discourse and Everyday Responses to Sexual Violence. Laws, [s.l.], v. 7, n. 21, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7020021. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/2/21. Acesso em: 24 jul. 2025

GIANNINI, Mary Margaret. Equal Rights for Equal Rites?: Victim Allocution, Defendant Allocution, and the Crime Victims’ Rights. Yale Law and Policy Review, [s.l.], v. 26, n. 2, p. 431-84, 2008. Disponível em: https://openyls.law.yale.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/d8ce1ba2-74e4-4d3f-926f-c5028892d40b/content. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2025.

HERDY, Rachel; CASTELLIANO, Carolina. 2021. Por que precisamos de bons ouvintes?: Henry foi vítima de “injustiça epistêmica”. Consultor jurídico, São Paulo, 30 abr. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.conjur.com.br/2021-abr-30/limite-penalpor-precisamos-bons-ouvintes-henry-tambem-foi-vitima-injustica. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2025.

JACKSON, Debra L. 2018. “Me too”: epistemic injustice and the struggle for recognition. Feminist Philosophy Quaterly, [s.l.], v. 4, n. 4, 2018. Disponível em: https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/article/view/6231. Acesso em: 30 set. 2025.

LACKEY, Jennifer. False Confessions and Testimonial Injustice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, [s.l.], v. 110, n. 1, p. 43-68, 2020. Disponível em: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol110/iss1/4/. Acesso em: 23 jul. 2025.

MEDINA, José. The Epistemology of resistance: gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Disponível em: The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination | Oxford Academic. Acesso em: 30 set. 2025.

MEDINA, José. Agential Epistemic Injustice and Collective Epistemic Resistance in the Criminal Justice System. Social Epistemology, [s.l.], v. 35, n. 2, p. 185-196, 2021. Disponível em: https://philpapers.org/rec/MEDAEI. Acesso em:15 maio 2025.

MEDINA, José. Injusticia epistémica y activismo epistémico en las protestas sociales feministas. Revista Latinoaméricana de Filosofía Política, [s.l.], v. 10 n. 8, p. 227-250, 2021. Disponível em: https://rlfp.org.ar/revista/index.php/RLFP/article/view/127/63. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2025

POHLHAUS JR., Gaile. Epistemic Agency Under oppression. Philosophical Papers, [s.l.], v. 49, n. 2, p. 233-251, 2020. Disponível em: https://philpapers.org/rec/POHEAU. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2025.

RODRÍGUEZ EVERAERT, Ana Sofía. El tribunal de las mujeres en Oaxaca. Nexos, mar. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.nexos.com.mx/?p=66497&fbclid=IwAR2CPNgtWq5S9C_oxysNF24bu-zJot_4bWZdAGovG9A5ri2Y0UyX7u8_rAE. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2025

ROGERS, Taylor. Resisting Epistemic Oppression. Humana.mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, [s.l.], v. 14, n. 39, p. 175-93, 2021. Disponível em: https://share.google/aLVSSkZ67jvMvzrah. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2025.

SANTIAGO, Cassandra; CRISS, Doug. An activist, a little girl and the heartbreaking origin of “Me too”. CNN, 17 out. 2017. Disponível em: https://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/17/us/me-too-tarana-burke-origin-trnd/index.html. Acesso em: 30 set. 2025.

SEGATO, Rita Laura. Las estructuras elementales de la violencia: ensayos sobre género entre la antropología, el psicoanálisis y los derechos humanos. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2003. Disponível em: https://redmovimientos.mx/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Segato-Rita.-Las-Estructuras-elementales-de-la-violencia-comprimido.pdf. Acesso em: 30 set. 2025.

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

Jerade, M. (2025). Justice institutions facing epistemic injustices in sexual violence. Direito Em Movimento, 23, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.70622/2238-7110.2025.668

Issue

Section

Seção Especial - Gênero e Injustiças Epistêmicas

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...